1. Comparison of Decentralized Systems to Centralized Systems
**Decentralized Network, Distributed Ledger, and Blockchain**
-Structure and Control: Decentralized networks operate on the principle of distributing control across multiple nodes, meaning no single entity has authority over the network. In contract, a centralized system, such as government-controlled fiat currency, places control in the hands of a central authority (government or financial institution), allowing for regulatory oversight and direct monetary policy implementation.
– Transparency and Trust: Blockchain Technology allows for transparency in transactions, as all parties can view the same immutable ledger, removing the need for trust in a central authority. In centralized systems, trust relies on the institution’s integrity, which can be compromised.
– Resilience and Security: Decentralization enhances security, as there is no single point of failure. If one node in a decentralized network fails or is attacked, the other nodes can continue operating. In a centralized system, a cyberattack on the central authority could incapacitate the entire system.
– Accessibility and Inclusivity: Decentralized networks can increase accessibility to financial services for individuals who are unbanked or underbanked, fostering financial inclusion without the barriers imposed by traditional banking institutions. Centralized financial systems may limit access due to bureaucratic hurdles and requirements.
– Monetary Policy and Supply Control: The issued currency in centralized system can be subject to inflationary policies through monetary supply manipulation, while cryptocurrencies typically have predetermined supply limits (ex: Bitcoin has a max supply of 21 million coins), which can create deflationary dynamics.
2. Differences Between Buying Crypto from Exchanges vs Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
a. Purchasing Crypto from Coin Base or Similar Exchanges
– Direct Ownership: When buying cryptocurrency directly from an exchange like Coin base, you are obtaining actual crypto assets. This allows you to hold, transfer, or utilize them for transactions or investments directly in the crypto ecosystem.
– Personal Control of Assets: Direct purchases mean you can store your crypto in private wallets, providing complete control over the assets. Independently managing these assets includes the responsibility of securing private keys.
– Volatility Exposure: Direct ownership exposes you to the full extent of price volatility of the crypto asset, allowing for potential high rewards but also increased risk.
b. Buying through Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs):
– Indirect Ownership: When you buy ETfsa that track cryptocurrencies, you generally own shares of the fund rather than the underlying asset. This provides exposure to the cryptocurrency market without direct ownership.
– Ease of Investment: ETFs can be bought and sold through traditional brokerage accounts, making them more accessible for investors who may not want to engage with crypto exchanges. This also simplifies tax reporting, as ETFs are regulated securities.
– Market Dynamics: An ETF often experiences price deviations from the underlying assets due to factors such as supply and demand for the ETFs themselves, which might not accurately reflect the price of the currencies they are meant to track.
-Management Fees: Investing in ETFs typically includes management fees and expense, which can erode returns over time, unlike buying crypto directly, where to pay transaction fees but do not incur further management costs.
3. Anticipated Corporate America and Municipal Responses to Bitcoin’s Asset Class Approval
a. Initial Sentiment Shift: The approval of Bitcoin as an asset class is expected to lend increased legitimacy and credibility to cryptocurrencies. Corporate America and municipalities may start to view Bitcoin not just as speculative assets but as legitimate compounds of diversified investment portfolios.
b. Investment Strategies and Allocation: Corporations may consider allocating a portion of their treasury reserves into Bitcoin as an inflation hedge or a store of value, similar to the trend seen with companies like MicroStrategy and Tesla. This could lead to a wave of institutional adoption of cryptocurrencies.
c. Innovative Financial Products: The financial markets may see increased offerings of products related to Bitcoin, such as new EFTs, derivatives, and structured products. This innovation could cater to both retail and institutional investors, diversifying risk and enhancing liquidity.
d. Long-term Market Effects: Over time, as more corporations and municipalities adopt cryptocurrencies, this could lead to greater market stability and more resilient ecosystems. The interplay between traditional financial institutions and cryptocurrencies could evolve into a hybrid reality where both coexist, driving technological advancements and financial literacy among consumers.
Thanks
Angela Brady-Williams
READ NEWSLETTER ARTICLE HERE: https://prisonprofessorstalent.com/journal-entries/march-5-2024-lesson-5-digital-economy-bitcoin-history/
