Judge John R. Adams
Criminal Case:5:17-CR-091
Scandal And Exposure
This is a cry for help, to anyone willing to listen. I’m trying to make my story know, with the hope of highlighting the gross infraction and wrongdoings of the criminal justice system.
During my “fair and impartial trial”, my rights were blatantly violated. All my efforts to make these transgressions know were innored and dusted under the rug.
My case, with the misdeeds that occured, if made apparent will result in numerous arrests of government officials.
This scandal stems from the bottom, all the way to the top. It includes the ATF Agents, U.S. District Attorney, my appointed Attorney and Judge who resided over my case.
It all revovles around falsified testimony, the withholding of my discovery before and during trial, and an extremly uncredible confidential informant.
The United States Court for the Northern District of Ohio has shown its ability to bend the law to its will yet once again.
Jamel Anthony was arrested on a Criminal Complaint alleging multiple sales of small quantities of crack cocaine. aHis Indictment was based on (5) “controlled” buys spread out from October of 2016 through March of 2017 and supported by officers’ sworn affidavirs and video/audio recordings.
Aren’t the sworn affidavits of officers of the laws supposed to be true and accurate? I guess that isn’t a requirement for the prosecution of drugs offense in the Northern District of Ohio… On the “controlled” buys, the DEA reports were intentionally falsified. Statements made by the officers alleged a female who was already locked up. to be standing in the Defendant’s front yard (Nakita Morgan). The sworn affidavit conveniently left out other illegal activities of the CI’s during the operation that could have easily been proven using phone records that were conveniently denied to the Defendant. Remarkably, CI Harry Lee Taylor was involved in drug sales, gun sales, and probation violations with the blessings of the District Court Judge, the US District Attorney, and Special Agents Gregory Brindza, and John Smerglia. Justice in Canton, Ohio is what the police say it is.
Aren’t these type of rights violations far too normal in the criminal justice system? The video/audio evidence that cases are base on is being kept from the people alleged of committing crimes… Phone records alleged to support government evidence are being providing to juries in part with pieces edited to intentionally changetheir meanings… Entire calls calling to question the Government’s “theory of the case” are being conveniently buried and available only the Government… is it legal to intentionally deny a Defendant’s timely requests for evidence by holding the filing until it is past a deadline? The Sixth Circuit District Courts did all all this and more on the Smith case.
But this is only the beginning… the Honorable District Court Judge John R. Adams was allowed to oversee the Smith prosecution while under investigation for misconduct and mental emotional disabilities rending “him unable to discharge the his office.” On February 15, 2013, four complainants (all US District Court Judges) filed a Complaint of Judicial Misconduct against Judge John R. Adams of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio alleging the Judge committed by misconduct by issuing a Show Cause Order to a fellow Judge (albeit a Magistrate Judge). The Complaint alleged this behavior, as well as disruptive behavior directed at other Judges of the district, constituted “conduct prejudicial to the effective and expedient administration of the business of the courts.”
In turn, he lost jurisdiction over cases from September 10, 2015 through September 10 2017. Despite this decision, the Smith case was added to Judge Adams’s docket in April of 2017. See In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct (No. 06-13-90009 February 22, 2016).
And it doesn’t stop there… the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference of the United States overheard the appeal of the Adams case and reversed the relevant part of the decision ofn August 14, 2017. The reviewing judges stated ” (b)ecause the Judicial Council did not include in its Order any specific findings regarding whether Judge Adams’s conduct has adversely affected his ability to discharge the djudicative duties of his office, we vacate the portion of the Judicial Council’s Order that prohibits the assignment of new cases to Judge Adams for two years and transfers Judge Adams’s current cases to other judges.”
Do you see the problem here? A special committee is formed. Its investigation leads the Judicial Council of the Sixth Circuit to bar Judge Adams from hearing any ongoing cases or receiving any new cases for two years. The Council boldly states that this Order is “necessary to protect the public and the judiciary from the possibility of Judge Adams engaging in inappropriate or embarrassing behavior while the investigation (into his mental health) continues.” A year and a half later, the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference of the United States comes along and cleans up the Sixth Circuit’s mess by chaning the Order to allow this Judge to carry on as usual despite his to cooperate with the Order prompted by the SIC and ordered by the Judicial Council of the Sixth Circuit.
Akron Beacon Journal, Federal Judge John Adams disciplined, ordered to undergo psychiatric evaluation; Adams says he won’t step down from Akron bench. Staff Writer, Akron Beacon Journal, Published 4:00 p.m. ET Aug. 16, 2017.
I believe the case against Jamel Anthony Smith was obtained by the violation of the very laws this Government was attemting to uphold.
/s/Jamel Anthony Smith
